Skip to main content

Posts

Re: Kafka 4.4.0 formal release date -- Important

Hi Vivek, Because of the process for releasing versions in the ASF, we can't really give you an exact date until the very same day the release happens (or in some cases a couple of days before). Each Release Candidate is proposed and must be validated by the community and maintainers. Currently, we are testing RC1 and it seems there are some problems. So probably another release candidate needs to be created. Best, On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 11:10 AM Vivek Agarwal B via users < users@kafka.apache.org> wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > I believe we should now have confirmation of the exact release date for > Kafka 4.4.0. Could you please share the confirmed date? > > Regards > Vivek > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthias J. Sax <mjsax@apache.org> > Sent: 17 September 2026 05:59 > To: Mayank Maheshwari M <mayank.m.maheshwari@ericsson.com>; Vivek Agarwal > B <vivek.b.agarwal@ericsson.com>; users@k...

RE: Kafka 4.4.0 formal release date -- Important

Hi Matthias, I believe we should now have confirmation of the exact release date for Kafka 4.4.0. Could you please share the confirmed date? Regards Vivek -----Original Message----- From: Matthias J. Sax <mjsax@apache.org> Sent: 17 September 2026 05:59 To: Mayank Maheshwari M <mayank.m.maheshwari@ericsson.com>; Vivek Agarwal B <vivek.b.agarwal@ericsson.com>; users@kafka.apache.org Cc: Ashish Verma V <ashish.v.verma@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: Kafka 4.4.0 formal release date -- Important No updates... We are waiting for RC2. But today, a potentially new blocker bug was found... On 9/16/26 5:27 AM, Mayank Maheshwari M wrote: > Hi @Matthias J. Sax, > > Unfortunately, I have not been able to follow the development mailing list to monitor the progress, as you suggested, due to security constraints at Ericsson. > > I understand that you previously mentioned the Kafka release may require approximately two more weeks. As noted ...

Re: [VOTE] 4.4.0 RC1

Hi Omnia, Thanks for the RC. There seems to be the same problems as with the 4.2.2 RC and the staged Maven artifacts seem to be missing in the staging repo. (I wonder if for some reason both RCs were dropped by the Maven repo or if there is some issue with doing two releases in parallel and you are overwriting each other πŸ€”) Thanks Jakub On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 4:10 PM Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, > > This is the 2nd candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.4.0. > > Apache Kafka 4.4.0 is a minor release that includes 26 KIPs spanning > improvements to all components. > > Release notes for the 4.4.0 release: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.4.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > Please download, test and vote by Friday, September 25, 2026, 12:30pm BST > (4:30am PT) > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign th...

Re: [VOTE] 4.4.0 RC1

Hi Omnia I tested the 4.4 branch and encountered a test failure, but it is unrelated to 4.4 branch. see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-21146 for details Best, Chia-Ping Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> ζ–Ό 2026εΉ΄9月23ζ—₯ι€±δΈ‰ δΈ‹εˆ6:18寫道: > Adding both users and Kafka-clients > > > On 23 Sep 2026, at 11:11, Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Here is the report for system testing > > > > > https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2026-09-22--001.1442301f-18b4-4a90-a790-4f8550f93d20--1790111851--apache--4.4--812f9108eb/report.html > > The two failed test cases are same as the one mentioned in 4.3.1 RC2 so > not new issue > > > >> On 22 Sep 2026, at 15:09, Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, ...

Re: [VOTE] 4.4.0 RC1

Adding both users and Kafka-clients > On 23 Sep 2026, at 11:11, Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is the report for system testing > > https://confluent-open-source-kafka-branch-builder-system-test-results.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/trunk/2026-09-22--001.1442301f-18b4-4a90-a790-4f8550f93d20--1790111851--apache--4.4--812f9108eb/report.html > The two failed test cases are same as the one mentioned in 4.3.1 RC2 so not new issue > >> On 22 Sep 2026, at 15:09, Omnia Ibrahim <o.g.h.ibrahim@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, >> >> This is the 2nd candidate for release of Apache Kafka 4.4.0. >> >> Apache Kafka 4.4.0 is a minor release that includes 26 KIPs spanning improvements to all components. >> >> Release notes for the 4.4.0 release: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kafka/4.4.0-rc1/RELEASE_NOTES.html...

Re: Is KRaft dedicated controller(static quorum) → combined mode migration supported in kafka 3.9.1

Hi Benson, Yes, your steps look correct to me. The migration to combined nodes should work. Just be noted, if you want to add some lagged nodes into the voters, it might impact the quorum because it needs the majority of nodes to be caught up. Thank you, Luke On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 1:55 PM Xiong, Benson via users < users@kafka.apache.org> wrote: > + kafka dev group... > > From: Xiong, Benson via users <users@kafka.apache.org> > Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2026 at 17:56 > To: users@kafka.apache.org <users@kafka.apache.org> > Cc: Zhang, Vinson <vinson.zhang@sap.com>; Yang, Yuanhao < > yuanhao.yang@sap.com>; Zhang, Reggie <reggie.zhang@sap.com>; Xiong, > Benson <benson.xiong01@sap.com> > Subject: Is KRaft dedicated controller(static quorum) → combined mode > migration supported in kafka 3.9.1 > > Hi Kafka community, > > > I’d like to confirm whether an in-place KRaft to...

Re: Is KRaft dedicated controller(static quorum) → combined mode migration supported in kafka 3.9.1

+ kafka dev group... From: Xiong, Benson via users <users@kafka.apache.org> Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2026 at 17:56 To: users@kafka.apache.org <users@kafka.apache.org> Cc: Zhang, Vinson <vinson.zhang@sap.com>; Yang, Yuanhao <yuanhao.yang@sap.com>; Zhang, Reggie <reggie.zhang@sap.com>; Xiong, Benson <benson.xiong01@sap.com> Subject: Is KRaft dedicated controller(static quorum) → combined mode migration supported in kafka 3.9.1 Hi Kafka community, I’d like to confirm whether an in-place KRaft topology change from dedicated controllers(static quorum) to combined broker/controller nodes is officially supported? For example: Current topology: Controllers: 101,102,103 with process.roles=controller Brokers: 1,2,3 with process. Roles=broker Current quorum: controller.quorum.voters=101@host1:9093,102@host2:9093,103@host3:9093 Target topology: Nodes: 1,2,3 with process.roles=broker, controller Target quorum: control...