Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from January, 2022

Re: Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active?

Sorry, I just meant mesh in the generic sense. A topology where every node is directly connected to every other node is sometimes called a "fully-connected mesh topology". In this context, I mean that you can set up a replication topology where every cluster is replicated directly to every other cluster, which is what you're after, I think. Ryanne On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 2:18 PM Doug Whitfield < dwhitfield@perforce.com > wrote: > Hi Ryanne, > > I think you are probably correct, but just for clarity, you are talking > about a data mesh, not a service mesh, correct? > > Best Regards, > -- > > Doug Whitfield | Enterprise Architect, OpenLogic< > https://www.openlogic.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > > > Perforce Software< > http://www.perforce.com/?utm_leadsource=email-s...

Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed

I mean " pull request". Ref: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/about-pull-requests Thanks. Luke Andreas Gillmann < andreas.gillmann@gls-itservices.com > 於 2022年1月31日 週一 下午6:34 寫道: > Hello Luke, > > yes I will do so, but please tell me, what is a PR? > > Regards, > Andreas > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2022 10:04 > An: Kafka Users < users@kafka.apache.org > > Betreff: Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the > heartbeat failed > > Hi Andreas, > > Could you open a bug in Kafka JIRA > < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/issues/KAFKA-13523?filter=allopenissues > > > ? > And you're welcome to create a PR for this issue. > > Let me know ...

Re: Kafka Consumer Fairness when fetching events from different partitions.

On Monday, January 31, 2022, Chad Preisler < chad.preisler@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello, > > I got this from the JavaDocs for KafkaConsumer. > > * If a consumer is assigned multiple partitions to fetch data from, it > will try to consume from all of them at the same time, > * effectively giving these partitions the same priority for consumption. > However in some cases consumers may want to > * first focus on fetching from some subset of the assigned partitions at > full speed, and only start fetching other partitions > * when these partitions have few or no data to consume. > > * One of such cases is stream processing, where processor fetches from two > topics and performs the join on these two streams. > * When one of the topics is long lagging behind the other, the processor > would like to pause fetching from the ahead topic > * in order to get the lagging stream to catch up. Another example is > b...

Re: Kafka Consumer Fairness when fetching events from different partitions.

Hello, I got this from the JavaDocs for KafkaConsumer. * If a consumer is assigned multiple partitions to fetch data from, it will try to consume from all of them at the same time, * effectively giving these partitions the same priority for consumption. However in some cases consumers may want to * first focus on fetching from some subset of the assigned partitions at full speed, and only start fetching other partitions * when these partitions have few or no data to consume. * One of such cases is stream processing, where processor fetches from two topics and performs the join on these two streams. * When one of the topics is long lagging behind the other, the processor would like to pause fetching from the ahead topic * in order to get the lagging stream to catch up. Another example is bootstraping upon consumer starting up where there are * a lot of history data to catch up, the applications usually want to get the latest data on some of the topics befor...

Re: Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active?

just want to understand that you are talking about below scenario Mirroring data between A <----->B and B<---->C correct ? ________________________________ From: Doug Whitfield < dwhitfield@perforce.com > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 2:18 PM To: users@kafka.apache.org < users@kafka.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active? [External] Hi Ryanne, I think you are probably correct, but just for clarity, you are talking about a data mesh, not a service mesh, correct? Best Regards, -- Doug Whitfield | Enterprise Architect, OpenLogic< https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlogic.com%2F%3Futm_leadsource%3Demail-signature%26utm_source%3Doutlook-direct-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_campaign%3D2019-common%26utm_content%3Demail-signature-link&amp;data=04%7C01%7CManoj.Agrawal2%40cognizant.com%7Ca2b9fb3597504e0fcecf08d9e4f6d453%7Cde08c40719b9427d9fe8edf25430...

Re: Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active?

Hi Ryanne, I think you are probably correct, but just for clarity, you are talking about a data mesh, not a service mesh, correct? Best Regards, -- Doug Whitfield | Enterprise Architect, OpenLogic< https://www.openlogic.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > Perforce Software< http://www.perforce.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > Visit us on: LinkedIn< https://www.linkedin.com/company/perforce?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > | Twitter< https://twitter.com/perforce?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_...

Re: Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active?

Doug, you can have any number of clusters with a fully-connected mesh topology, which I think is what you are looking for. Ryanne On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 12:44 PM Doug Whitfield < dwhitfield@perforce.com > wrote: > Hi folks, > > Every example I have seen uses two clusters in active/active and testing > suggests I can only get two clusters to run active/active. > > I think we will need to use a fan-in pattern if we want more than two > clusters. Is that correct? > > Best Regards, > -- > > Doug Whitfield | Enterprise Architect, OpenLogic< > https://www.openlogic.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > > > Perforce Software< > http://www.perforce.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=e...

Is it possible to run MirrorMaker in active/active/active?

Hi folks, Every example I have seen uses two clusters in active/active and testing suggests I can only get two clusters to run active/active. I think we will need to use a fan-in pattern if we want more than two clusters. Is that correct? Best Regards, -- Doug Whitfield | Enterprise Architect, OpenLogic< https://www.openlogic.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > Perforce Software< http://www.perforce.com/?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > Visit us on: LinkedIn< https://www.linkedin.com/company/perforce?utm_leadsource=email-signature&utm_source=outlook-direct-email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-common&utm_content=email-signature-link > | Twitter< https://twitter.com/perforce?utm_leadsource...

Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed

PR means "Pull Request". It is a way to have others review your code changes and, when ready, they can merge them in. https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/about-pull-requests From: Andreas Gillmann < andreas.gillmann@gls-itservices.com > Date: Monday, January 31, 2022 at 4:34 AM To: users@kafka.apache.org < users@kafka.apache.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] AW: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed Hello Luke, yes I will do so, but please tell me, what is a PR? Regards, Andreas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2022 10:04 An: Kafka Users < users@kafka.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed Hi Andreas, Could you open a bug in Kafka JIRA < https://urldefense.com...

AW: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed

Hello Luke, yes I will do so, but please tell me, what is a PR? Regards, Andreas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > Gesendet: Sonntag, 30. Januar 2022 10:04 An: Kafka Users < users@kafka.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed Hi Andreas, Could you open a bug in Kafka JIRA < https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/issues/KAFKA-13523?filter=allopenissues > ? And you're welcome to create a PR for this issue. Let me know if you need any help. Thank you. Luke On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:10 PM Andreas Gillmann < andreas.gillmann@gls-itservices.com > wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have noticed a problem which I have also discussed with RedHat ( > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DBZ-4521 ): > > Prerequisites: > > - Debezium connector with heartbeat configuration ( "heartbeat.topi...

Re: Connector is still in 'RUNNING' status even though the heartbeat failed

Hi Andreas, Could you open a bug in Kafka JIRA < https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/KAFKA/issues/KAFKA-13523?filter=allopenissues > ? And you're welcome to create a PR for this issue. Let me know if you need any help. Thank you. Luke On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:10 PM Andreas Gillmann < andreas.gillmann@gls-itservices.com > wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have noticed a problem which I have also discussed with RedHat ( > https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DBZ-4521 ): > > Prerequisites: > > - Debezium connector with heartbeat configuration ( "heartbeat.topics.prefix" > is set) > - Heartbeat topic on Kafka side does NOT exists > - Parameter auto.create.topics is disabled (=false) > > Execution: > > - Connector was created > - Connector starts the heartbeat > - Connector logs the following entry: [WARN] 2022-01-06 13:25:30,094 > [kafka-producer-net...

Re: Apache log4j 1.x vulnerability mitigations on Kafka

Excellent Luke I will take a look shortly On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:12 PM Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Israel and all, > > The PR to add CVE-2022-23302 > < https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w9p3-5cr8-m3jj > and CVE-2022-23305 > < https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-65fg-84f6-3jq3 > is here: > https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/396 > > Welcome to review. > > Thank you. > Luke > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22 AM Israel Ekpo < israelekpo@gmail.com > wrote: > > > Thanks Luke for the prompt response > > > > +1 on the PR for the CVE page update > > > > You can cc me on the PR when it's ready and I will take a look at it > > > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:44 PM Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > Hi Karupasamy, > > > > > > Thanks for your aski...

Re: Apache log4j 1.x vulnerability mitigations on Kafka

Hi Israel and all, The PR to add CVE-2022-23302 < https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-w9p3-5cr8-m3jj > and CVE-2022-23305 < https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-65fg-84f6-3jq3 > is here: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/396 Welcome to review. Thank you. Luke On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 11:22 AM Israel Ekpo < israelekpo@gmail.com > wrote: > Thanks Luke for the prompt response > > +1 on the PR for the CVE page update > > You can cc me on the PR when it's ready and I will take a look at it > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:44 PM Luke Chen < showuon@gmail.com > wrote: > > > Hi Karupasamy, > > > > Thanks for your asking. Answering your question below: > > > > > 1. Are the CVEs *CVE-2022-23302, CVE-2022-23305* applicable to the > Apache > > Kafka? > > > > Unfortunately, yes, these 2 CVEs: *CVE-2022-23302, CVE-2022-23305* are > also...