Thanks. What influence does it have for consumers and producers when
partition number is more than broker number, which means at least one
broker serves two partitions for one topic ? performance wise.
Peter Bukowinski <pmbuko@gmail.com> 于2020年2月26日周三 下午11:02写道:
> Disk usage is one reason to expand. Another reason is if you need more
> ingest or output throughout for your topic data. If your producers aren't
> able to send data to kafka fast enough or your consumers are lagging, you
> might benefit from more brokers and more partitions.
>
> -- Peter
>
> > On Feb 26, 2020, at 12:56 AM, 张祥 <xiangzhang1128@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In documentation, it is described how to expand cluster:
> >
> https://kafka.apache.org/20/documentation.html#basic_ops_cluster_expansion
> .
> > But I am wondering what the criteria for expand is. I can only think of
> > disk usage threshold. For example, suppose several disk usage exceed 80%.
> > Is this correct and is there more ?
>
partition number is more than broker number, which means at least one
broker serves two partitions for one topic ? performance wise.
Peter Bukowinski <pmbuko@gmail.com> 于2020年2月26日周三 下午11:02写道:
> Disk usage is one reason to expand. Another reason is if you need more
> ingest or output throughout for your topic data. If your producers aren't
> able to send data to kafka fast enough or your consumers are lagging, you
> might benefit from more brokers and more partitions.
>
> -- Peter
>
> > On Feb 26, 2020, at 12:56 AM, 张祥 <xiangzhang1128@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In documentation, it is described how to expand cluster:
> >
> https://kafka.apache.org/20/documentation.html#basic_ops_cluster_expansion
> .
> > But I am wondering what the criteria for expand is. I can only think of
> > disk usage threshold. For example, suppose several disk usage exceed 80%.
> > Is this correct and is there more ?
>
Comments
Post a Comment