thank you. i will try fluent-bit for now.
Raphael Mazelier wrote:
> maybe you can you try another log shipper to validate this assumption;
> there are plenty and fluentd is already an old (and buggy and slow one);
> you can try fluent-bit or vector maybe.
>
Raphael Mazelier wrote:
> maybe you can you try another log shipper to validate this assumption;
> there are plenty and fluentd is already an old (and buggy and slow one);
> you can try fluent-bit or vector maybe.
>
Comments
Post a Comment